|
City of Howell v Amell, Docket No. 261228, Unpublished December 19, 2006 (2006) |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2006 |
IMPORTANT CASE: What does it mean if a motorist blows under the legal limit? Is the prosecutor required to provide expert testimony as to what an arbitrary number means? Yes, according to several out-of-state decisions, but NO according to the Michigan Court of Appeals. According to the Court of Appeals, a jury can figure it out on their own (even though most people are not actually intoxicated at .08, and the jury instructions tell jurors to give a chemical test whatever weight they believe it deserves.) This is a terrible decision and not particularly well developed. |
|
State of Michigan v Richard James Knudsen |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1998 |
|
|
State of Michigan v William Kenneth Haker |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1987 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Darrell Edward Brink |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2003 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Kevin Lee Pohl |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1994 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Bradley Alan Wolfbauer |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2012 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Maria Candelaria Kellett |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2008 |
---------------------------------------- |
|
State of Michigan v Brent David Mcknight |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2001 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Justin J. Malik |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2010 |
|
|
Dennis Dabrowski v Secretary of State |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1993 |
|