State of Michigan v Stiehl, Docket No. 283641, unpublished September 15, 2009 (2009) |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2009 |
Driver following accident was 0.06. Dr. Felix Adatsi from the Michigan State Police Toxicology Unit was permitted to testify to retrograde extrapolation, claiming that the driver was .09 at the time of driving based on nothing more than standard alcohol elimination rates. Without extensive information, retrograde extrapolation is junk science. Defendant discharged his attorney during the trial, so it seems likely that the prosecutor was able to roll out this bogus science without a fight. |
State of Michigan v Raymond Glenn Toohey |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1990 |
|
State of Michigan v Carl Richard Nantelle |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2005 |
|
State of Michigan v Christopher Mark Martin |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2014 |
|
State of Michigan v Timothy Alvin Warriner |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1999 |
|
State of Michigan v Bette Jane Erwin |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1995 |
|
State of Michigan v Mark Ryan Nickerson, Docket No. 271459, Unpublished March 13, 2007 (2007) |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2007 |
CRIMINAL DISCOVERY: Prosecutors are not entitled to reciprocal discovery in misdemeanor cases. |
People v Pipkin |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1979 |
|
State of Michigan v Melissa Lynn Lounsbery |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2001 |
|
State of Michigan v Leslie Anne Lafrance |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2003 |
|