City of Howell v Amell, Docket No. 261228, Unpublished December 19, 2006 (2006) |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2006 |
IMPORTANT CASE: What does it mean if a motorist blows under the legal limit? Is the prosecutor required to provide expert testimony as to what an arbitrary number means? Yes, according to several out-of-state decisions, but NO according to the Michigan Court of Appeals. According to the Court of Appeals, a jury can figure it out on their own (even though most people are not actually intoxicated at .08, and the jury instructions tell jurors to give a chemical test whatever weight they believe it deserves.) This is a terrible decision and not particularly well developed. |
City of Holland v John Dreyer |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1990 |
|
City of East Lansing v David J. Yocca |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1985 |
|
Bridgman v Bunker |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1968 |
|
Bradley Alan Wolfbauer v City of Berkley |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2013 |
|
Bloomfield Township v Jordan Kane |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2013 |
|
Bay County Prosecutor v Bay County District Judge And Gary Mark Bellor |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1981 |
|
Barbara L. Simonds, Personal Representative of The Estate of Brian Scott Buist, Deceased, v Dale Tibbitts And The Village of Stockbridge |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1987 |
|
Arthur Lee Harbison v Secretary of The State of Michigan |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1987 |
|
Arthur Lee Harbison v Secretary of The State of Michigan |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1985 |
|