City of Holland v John Dreyer |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1990 |
|
City of Howell v Amell, Docket No. 261228, Unpublished December 19, 2006 (2006) |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2006 |
IMPORTANT CASE: What does it mean if a motorist blows under the legal limit? Is the prosecutor required to provide expert testimony as to what an arbitrary number means? Yes, according to several out-of-state decisions, but NO according to the Michigan Court of Appeals. According to the Court of Appeals, a jury can figure it out on their own (even though most people are not actually intoxicated at .08, and the jury instructions tell jurors to give a chemical test whatever weight they believe it deserves.) This is a terrible decision and not particularly well developed. |
City of Kalamazoo v Gary Allen Willis; State of Michigan v John Edward Collopy |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1989 |
|
City of Livonia v Robin Ann Dinha |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2001 |
|
City of Muskegon v County of Muskegon |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1975 |
|
City of Northville v Richard J. Andreason |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1997 |
15 minute rule violation - suppression of breath test |
City of Plymouth v Brittney Lynn Longeway |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2012 |
|
City of Plymouth v Michael Mcintosh |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2010 |
|
Collins v Secretary of State |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1971 |
|
Crampton v 54-A District Judge People v Hudgins People v Allen People v Jones |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1976 |
|