|
State of Michigan v Brenda June Piotrowski |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2005 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Erika-Nicole Bellamy |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2013 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Joseph Edward Levandoski |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1999 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Terry Lamont Poole |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1996 |
|
|
City of Howell v Amell, Docket No. 261228, Unpublished December 19, 2006 (2006) |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2006 |
IMPORTANT CASE: What does it mean if a motorist blows under the legal limit? Is the prosecutor required to provide expert testimony as to what an arbitrary number means? Yes, according to several out-of-state decisions, but NO according to the Michigan Court of Appeals. According to the Court of Appeals, a jury can figure it out on their own (even though most people are not actually intoxicated at .08, and the jury instructions tell jurors to give a chemical test whatever weight they believe it deserves.) This is a terrible decision and not particularly well developed. |
|
Groth v Degrandchamp |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1976 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Terrance Wayne Best |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2002 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Darrell Edward Brink |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2003 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Matthew Joseph Soares |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
2011 |
|
|
State of Michigan v Ronald Francis Wroblewski |
Michigan Court of Appeals |
1997 |
|